We could alternate between any of the above, or propose an experimental period trying different formats (eg 3-5 years), feeding back information and analysis as to what worked and what didn’t. As a small isolated set of groups, with considerable experience in the SCA and externally in analytical and strategic roles, we are well placed to undertake that sort of path.
After more than 40 years, NZ groups have a strong SCA culture and traditions. A change in selection process is not seen as doing any kind of disservice or dishonour to the wider SCA in the Known Worlde - simply acknowledging that it is time to reassess how we play in that World after half a century, and how we can strengthen and enhance it for the future. An NZ Principality modelling a working SCA structure which has high levels of equity and inclusiveness could have very beneficial flow-on effects for the rest of the Kingdom and elsewhere.
The opportunity for a change in culture and structure, particularly with widespread populace involvement in its development, means we get to have a say in what we want to become. That seemed inspirational for many and a major attraction. As one member said any model where any member in good standing can aspire one day to rule brings more honour yet!
Such a move will require significant discussion before we collectively settle on an acceptable process to submit. But Kiwis are well-versed in being adaptable and working together. We’ve also clearly demonstrated throughout the past 200 years a persistent and successful determination to be early adopters on the Right Side of History.