See also: 2020 Survey Results
An informal survey ran for two weeks up to Christmas 2023. At the time, SCANZ had just under 250 subscribing members; the survey had 137 NZ responses, coming from every NZ group and hamlet. Group proportions roughly corresponded to their current SCANZ membership count, with moderate over-representation from Ildhafn City and slightly under from Cluain and Southron Gaard.
CAVEAT: This was an informal survey, so no direct-to-member mailout occurred. Thus, we can only surmise how closely the results reflect what a formal membership poll would show.
Results
Results are split into several parts - all are limited to NZ responses unless noted:
- Headline results (below)
- Melissa's excellent further survey analysis * new
- PDF summary with auto-generated result charts & comments
- PDF of selected cross-tabs by group, level of activity etc.
- Zipfile containing csv of raw results including non-NZ responses
- A Reality Check article, January '24
Headline figures for 2023 Informal Survey
Total respondents: 151 NZ-based respondents: 137
Responses from NZ groups:
Ildhafn City: 24 Cluain: 15 - combined: 39 Darton: 30 Southron Gaard: 68 - response counts roughly match group proportions of SCANZ membership
From the six hamlets (included in the above totals): 18
Length of time in the SCA: See pie chart in PDF
Avg SCA activity level: 3.3 - 1 is very low, 3 "average", 5 very high
Note: for most other results below, the selection range was 0 to 5, hence 2.5 is "neutral".
0 is strongly opposed, 2.5 "neutral", 5 strongly in favour
Average from the above chart: 3.4 - this corresponds to an "enthusiasm score" of 68%
% of respondents currently in favour of forming an NZ Principality: 80.3%
Name and Device Scores - see Charts in PDF
Names:
Alcyon: 2.2 - 0 is strongly opposed, 2.5 "neutral", 5 strongly in favour
Crescent Isles: 3.9
Eagles Reach: 1.7
Devices: (see recommended devices)
"Kingfisher": 1.8
"Talon and Claws": 1.1
"Estencelly": 3.5
"InCrescent": 2.6
"Crescent Wrap": 2.8
Subsidiary Questions - see Charts in PDF
Coronet Selection process:
"Traditional": 2.2 - 0 is strongly opposed, 2.5 "neutral", 5 strongly in favour
"Champion": 2.8
"Triple Prowess": 3.1
Pre-vetting of Coronet contenders: 3.4 - 1 is very relaxed, 3 "neutral", 5 very strict,
Length of Coronet tenure:
Six months, like Kingdom of Lochac: 2.8 - 0 is strongly opposed, 2.5 "neutral", 5 strongly in favour
Nine months, like Principality of Insulae Draconis: 3.7
Investiture event:
Separate event, like Kingdom of Lochac: 3.0
Same as selection event ("Coronetiture"), like Insulae Draconis: 3.3
Working group signups: 25 people signed up to one or more working groups.
See also:
- PDF summary with auto-generated result charts & all comments
- PDF of selected cross-tabs by group, level of activity etc.
- Zipfile containing csv of raw results
- A Reality Check article, January '24
- 2020 Survey Results
If you spot any errors above, please report via the Feedback Form.